Incentives for carpooling and shared transportation encourage people to share rides, reducing the number of vehicles on the road and lowering emissions. Proponents argue that it reduces traffic congestion, lowers emissions, and promotes community interactions. Opponents argue that it may not significantly impact traffic, could be costly, and some people prefer the convenience of personal vehicles.
@9NC45VKRepublican18hrs18H
No, carpooling is impartial. Public transportation is the way to go.
@9N6RHRB3 days3D
Both statmenets make a refutable claim to the other, but I stand undivided by either item, even though it reduces emmisions, it hurts the amount of gas used and time at work to provide a stable income with the current economy.
@9N5WBYD4 days4D
No, the costs of managing such a program would feasibly outweigh any potential benefits
@9MZBS256 days6D
Some locations already do with HOV lanes. That is plenty.
@9MYQ4756 days6D
No, the government should subsidize walkable infrastructure and public transportation instead
No, if those services work well they will be an obvious choice without any incentives needed.
@9MQ5L2D1wk1W
No, the incentive for shared transportation services should be their efficiency and accessibility.
@9MMY3BY2wks2W
No, it can be dangerous sharing a ride with a stranger let alone you already getting in a car with one.
@Dry550Independent 2wks2W
Yes, but don’t discourage people from using personal vehicles, market it as a convenience, not a necessity
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
